<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing Go Blogs vs Overloading Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html</link>
	<description>A few moments to learn, a lifetime to master</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejo</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Well done! Thanks!!

Don&#039;t worry about changing past diagrams, if people are using feeds (most frequent behaviour) they&#039;ve already read your posts and won&#039;t usually come back to the old posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! Thanks!!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry about changing past diagrams, if people are using feeds (most frequent behaviour) they&#8217;ve already read your posts and won&#8217;t usually come back to the old posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nexik</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-145</guid>
		<description>yes I change software and now I using gowrite2. New look you can see here http://badukschool.blogspot.com/search/label/zhou%20ruiyang  old size: 334 kb new size: 7.62 KB but of course changing all diagrams on my side will take some times. Thanks for pointing me that gGo are making so huge png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes I change software and now I using gowrite2. New look you can see here <a href="http://badukschool.blogspot.com/search/label/zhou%20ruiyang" rel="nofollow">http://badukschool.blogspot.com/search/label/zhou%20ruiyang</a>  old size: 334 kb new size: 7.62 KB but of course changing all diagrams on my side will take some times. Thanks for pointing me that gGo are making so huge png</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejo</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Just a small sample, the new image at my next post &quot;discovering go books: tesuji&quot;. It&#039;s 285x311px, and it&#039;s 3.91KB.
Your board images at 320x320, occupy 200KB.
I hope you see my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small sample, the new image at my next post &#8220;discovering go books: tesuji&#8221;. It&#8217;s 285x311px, and it&#8217;s 3.91KB.<br />
Your board images at 320&#215;320, occupy 200KB.<br />
I hope you see my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejo</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t think modem connections are &quot;that marginal&quot;. I&#039;m just checking google analytics stats and it seems I receive about a 10% of dialup connections.
I know it&#039;s not much, but I think that having a site which weights around 200k makes it visible for them. A page which takes a few minutes to load, won&#039;t load on internet explorer. Back in my memory, I remember the times when I used to have my ***** modem connection and decided to disable images on my explorer. If I wanted to surf comfortably, I had to disable them, otherwise most pages wouldn&#039;t load or it would take them ages to do so.

In fact, I&#039;ve checked your blog (nothing personal, though) and I&#039;ve seen you only have one post on your homepage (which you already mentioned, and I think it&#039;s a good idea if your regular posts weight quite a lot), but on the next page there are a bunch of unoptimized images.
For example, the board images you are showing us, though helpful, weight around 200k each; and I counted over 20 of them... 
Personally it&#039;s not a problem for me, but your site might be &quot;un-visitable&quot; for a user without broadband connection.
I think you are using panda-glgo for making the diagrams. Switching the graphics to 2-colour and disabling board textures will reduce the image size considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t think modem connections are &#8220;that marginal&#8221;. I&#8217;m just checking google analytics stats and it seems I receive about a 10% of dialup connections.<br />
I know it&#8217;s not much, but I think that having a site which weights around 200k makes it visible for them. A page which takes a few minutes to load, won&#8217;t load on internet explorer. Back in my memory, I remember the times when I used to have my ***** modem connection and decided to disable images on my explorer. If I wanted to surf comfortably, I had to disable them, otherwise most pages wouldn&#8217;t load or it would take them ages to do so.</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;ve checked your blog (nothing personal, though) and I&#8217;ve seen you only have one post on your homepage (which you already mentioned, and I think it&#8217;s a good idea if your regular posts weight quite a lot), but on the next page there are a bunch of unoptimized images.<br />
For example, the board images you are showing us, though helpful, weight around 200k each; and I counted over 20 of them&#8230;<br />
Personally it&#8217;s not a problem for me, but your site might be &#8220;un-visitable&#8221; for a user without broadband connection.<br />
I think you are using panda-glgo for making the diagrams. Switching the graphics to 2-colour and disabling board textures will reduce the image size considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejo</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Yes!!! I totally support your idea!! If you only want to check a few blogs, GoAggregator is a good place to go.

By the way, Sol.ch is doing a nice job in his blog. And there is one from a korean pro too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!!! I totally support your idea!! If you only want to check a few blogs, GoAggregator is a good place to go.</p>
<p>By the way, Sol.ch is doing a nice job in his blog. And there is one from a korean pro too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thrashor</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>thrashor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-141</guid>
		<description>If bandwidth is a concern, you can just read the few best Go blogs, including this one, via the Go Aggregator&#039;s feeds (http://goaggregator.blogspot.com/). Most of the blogs at PlanetGo - which is a great site - are unfortunately inactive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If bandwidth is a concern, you can just read the few best Go blogs, including this one, via the Go Aggregator&#8217;s feeds (<a href="http://goaggregator.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://goaggregator.blogspot.com/</a>). Most of the blogs at PlanetGo &#8211; which is a great site &#8211; are unfortunately inactive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nexik</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-140</guid>
		<description>today the use of modem is marginal, but of course bandwidth is always issue. That is why i change way of showing posts on my side (on homepage only posts from last day).

Optimizing the site is good but recently you don&#039;t need to care too much about it.

about RSS: good rss reader download only header of any new feed and only when you are interested then it download the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>today the use of modem is marginal, but of course bandwidth is always issue. That is why i change way of showing posts on my side (on homepage only posts from last day).</p>
<p>Optimizing the site is good but recently you don&#8217;t need to care too much about it.</p>
<p>about RSS: good rss reader download only header of any new feed and only when you are interested then it download the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/83-optimizing-go-blogs-vs-overloading-feeds.html/comment-page-1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alejostenuki.com/blog/?p=83#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Yea, I second that Google Reader rocks.  RSS Readers have changed the way I view the web.

I&#039;d say about 80% of my surfing the web is via an RSS Reader.

You&#039;d also be surprised just how much of the web nowadays has RSS feeds.  Its not at all limited to only blogs.  I&#039;ve also got craigslist, forums, news sites, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I second that Google Reader rocks.  RSS Readers have changed the way I view the web.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say about 80% of my surfing the web is via an RSS Reader.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d also be surprised just how much of the web nowadays has RSS feeds.  Its not at all limited to only blogs.  I&#8217;ve also got craigslist, forums, news sites, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

